Automatic Exposure Control And Fixed mA Technique To Radiation Dose And Image Quality On Non Contrast Urology CT Scan
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Full Text)References
Baker ME, Dong F, Primak A, Obuchowski NA, Einstein D, Gandhi N, et al. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. 2012;(July):8–18. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22733888
Bauhs JA, Vrieze TJ, Primak RTRAN, Bruesewitz MR, Mccollough RTRCH. CT Dosimetry : Comparison of Measurement Techniques and. 2008;245–54.
Botsikas D, Stefanelli S, Becker CD. Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Versus Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Urolithiasis. 2014;(August):336–40.
Bruesewitz MR, Yu L, Vrieze TJ, Kofler JM, Mccollough CH, Dosed C. Smart mA – Automatic Exposure Control ( AEC ): Physics Principles and Practical Hints Automatic Exposure Control ( AEC ) systems in CT Using AEC to Prescribe the Desired Image Quality AEC and Image Quality. 2008;2008
Buhberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM, Boone JM GE. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging [Internet]. third edit. LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS; 2012. 1936 p. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=RKcTgTqeniwC&dq=the+essential+physics+of+medical+imaging&hl=id&source=gbs_navlinks
D Tack, Kalra MK GP. Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT [Internet]. Second. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. Available from: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Sf2fwu_xkV8C
E S. COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY Physical Principles, Clinical Application, and Quality Control. Fourth Edi. St.Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2016.
GE Company. GE Healthcare AutomA / SmartmA Theory TiP Training in Partnership AutomA Off GE Healthcare AutomA On. :1–5.
Gaweł G, Truszkiewicz A, Guz W, Medicine F. The influence of ODM technique on the radiation dose received by patients during head CT scan. 2018;1361(September):198–203.
Harder AM Den, Willemink MJ, Doormaal PJ Van, Wessels FJ, Lock MTWT, Schilham AMR, et al. Radiation dose reduction for CT assessment of urolithiasis using iterative reconstruction : A prospective intra-individual study. 2017;
Joshua Broder RP. Diagnostic Imaging for the Emergency Physician. In: W.B. Saunders, editor. Elsevier Inc; 2011. p. Pages 1-45. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781416061137100018
John G Webster, E Russell Ritenour STK-H. WEBB’S PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING. Second Edi. Medical Physics; 2012. 546 p.
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Kamath RS, Halpern EF, Saini S. Radiology Comparison of Z-Axis Automatic Tube Current Modulation Technique with Fixed Tube Current CT. 2004;(1):347–53.
Kubo T. Vendor free basics of radiation dose reduction techniques for CT. 2019;110(June 2018):14–21.
Mahesh M, Singh S, Kalra MK, Thrall JH, Mahesh M. Automatic Exposure Control in CT : Applications and Limitations AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE. JACR [Internet]. 2011;8(6):446–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.001
Mccollough CH et. al. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2008
Mcnitt-gray MF. AAPM / RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents : Topics in CT Radiation Dose in CT 1. 2002;1541–53. Available from: https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/rg.226025128
Mokhtar A, Elawdy M, El-hamid MA, Refaie H, El-diasty TA. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examination. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med [Internet]. 2017;48(3):701–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.03.005
Raman SP, Mahesh M. CT Scan Parameters and Radiation Dose : Practical Advice for. JACR [Internet]. 2013;10(11):840–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.032
Raman SP, Johnson PT, Deshmukh S. CT Dose Reduction Applications : Available Tools on the Latest Generation of CT Scanners. JACR [Internet]. 2013;10(1):37–41. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.025
Vaishnav JY, Jung WC, Popescu LM, Zeng R, Myers KJ. Objective assessment of image quality and dose reduction in CT iterative reconstruction Objective assessment of image quality and dose reduction in CT iterative reconstruction. 2014;071904
Trattner S, Pearson GDN, Chin C, Cody DD. Standardization and Optimization of CT Protocols to Achieve Low Dose. J Am Coll Radiol [Internet]. 2014;11(3):271–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32382/medkes.v16i1.1669
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Media Kesehatan Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Published By : Poltekkes Kemenkes Makassar
Office : Jl. Wijaya Kusuma Raya No. 46 Banta-Bantaeng, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia
Email : mediakesehatan@poltekkes-mks.ac.id
Media Kesehatan indexed by :
Protected By |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.